11th September 2017
By Jonathan Watts-Lay, Director, WEALTH at work, a leading provider of financial education, guidance and advice in the workplace.
The Pension Advice Allowance (PAA) became available this April to help individuals pay for the cost of regulated financial advice for retirement.
The allowance enables individuals to withdraw £500 from their pensions, at any age and up to three times but only once in a tax year. It is available to defined contribution (DC) pension savers as well as ‘hybrid’ pension savers with a DC or cash balance element.
It’s too early to say if it’s been a success but reports from some of the bigger schemes in the UK are stating there has been little or no uptake. This may be due to lack of public knowledge of the allowance or because as previous research has shown numerous times, people just aren’t willing to pay for financial advice. This reluctance, I believe, comes from individuals not understanding what financial advice is, or what it can do for them.
In contrast, when we look at the results of employees who have attended a pre-retirement education seminar in the workplace, around 60% go on to request further information and advice following a session. The difference is that following financial education, employees will realise how complicated pension decisions can be and will gain an understanding of how financial advice can help them.
In fact, financial education and guidance delivered in an informative and meaningful way can have a real impact during the pension accumulation stage, without the need for employees to access their pensions to pay for advice. For example, one of our clients carried out research into employee behaviour post education and guidance in the workplace. The results showed that following financial education, 40% of employees went on to increase their pension savings, and 20% increased their share plan contributions.
A cost issue?
Although the Treasury said there wouldn’t be an impact on scheme members accessing their pension to pay for advice, taking £500 from a pension scheme whether that is once, twice or three times, will no doubt have an impact on its end value. The earlier it is taken the bigger the impact, as the money taken will no longer have the opportunity to grow in value.
Indeed, higher figures than the £500 allowance were suggested in the consultation but the Treasury believed that by restricting it to this amount would spark innovation from financial advice providers to come up with cheaper or more automated ways of providing advice services for employees; in particular robo advice.
To date there are no robo services capable of assessing the complexities and range of lifetime savings that can be used to generate retirement income; or take into account taxation consequences and the risks inherent with income drawdown and other retirement strategies. I have no doubt there is a place for robo advice in making simple savings decisions – but not at-retirement.
But what is the alternative?
What many employees don’t realise is that it’s possible to receive financial advice on ‘a try before you buy’ basis without having to pay for it up-front, therefore keeping valuable savings in their pension to grow further and then only paying if they decide to act on what is recommended.
With these models available it’s hard to see why an employee would need to access their pension to pay for advice.
Workplace engagement is key
However innovative the service, the key to making sure that employees get the most of the money they’ve saved throughout their working lives is through engagement in the workplace.
Supporting employees with financial education and guidance will help them to make better decisions pre-retirement, without having to reduce the value of their pension savings unnecessarily. The benefit here is that employees save effectively and can afford to retire, something in both the employee and employers interests.
This then drives the process of taking financial advice, ensuring that employees understand their personal financial situation and are able to implement their retirement strategy in a tax efficient way.
In conclusion, the jury is out on if the PAA will be a success. Anything that provides options designed to lead to better outcomes for employees and pension scheme members is welcomed – but I believe the best results will arise from workplaces supporting employees with financial education, guidance and advice.
For further information, please contact us.
IMPORTANT – External links please read: Virus status
*Contents of links to external websites
Links to websites external to those of Wealth at Work Limited (also referred to here as ‘we’, ‘us’, ‘our’ ‘ours’) will usually contain some content that is not written by us and over which we have no authority and which we do not endorse. Therefore please be aware that we do not accept responsibility for the content of any third party site(s) except content that is specifically attributed to us or our employees and where we are the authors of such content. Nor do we endorse any organisation or publication to which we link and make no representations about them.
Please note that the content of this website including any external articles to which it links are not financial advice and must not be relied upon to make investment decisions. Further, please note that investments can fall as well as rise and that if investing you may get back less than you originally invested.
Subscription only sites
Where we have been quoted in an article or we are the authors of an article held on a third party website we may provide a link to that site, even though it is a subscription only publication. Please note that by doing so we are not advertising the subscription nor are we suggesting that you should subscribe. We are merely providing a link for those people who already have a subscription should they wish to read the article. If you do not have a subscription then often only the first lines of an article may be available to read. You should not rely on that limited content to form a view of what the whole article may say or conclude. Often a headline or an excerpt of an article are not representative of the article in full. Reading a part only and/or out of context may be misleading and must not be relied upon.