Default pathways at-retirement could lead to many pension scheme members losing out.

girl at junction sign

Some in the pensions industry believe that default retirement pathways protect individuals from making poor decumulation choices and the FCA has recently announced a consultation on how to implement default investment pathways for non-advised individuals entering drawdown.

Jonathan Watts-Lay, Director, WEALTH at work, comments;

“I don’t believe that anyone should be defaulted at-retirement without receiving financial guidance and making a proactive decision first. This view is supported by a recent poll* by WEALTH at work which found that 86% of respondents believe that employees should not be defaulted into a decumulation pathway at-retirement without financial guidance.”

He adds; “Defaulting individuals into something without a positive choice being made raises questions over if it’s within the pension providers or the member’s best interest and the effects could be costly. After all, it discourages shopping around and risks destroying freedom and choice in pensions.  Additionally, if those with more than one pension default based on individual pots rather than the collective value, the likely outcome will be sub-optimal with many losing out.”

*Poll carried out on the WEALTH at work website from July 2018 until November 2018. The poll asked ‘Do you believe that employees with a defined contribution scheme should be defaulted into a decumulation pathway at-retirement without financial guidance?’ and received 50 responses. www.wealthatwork.co.uk/corporate/your-say/polls/

Links to websites external to those of Wealth at Work Limited (also referred to here as 'we', 'us', 'our' 'ours') will usually contain some content that is not written by us and over which we have no authority and which we do not endorse. Any hyperlinks or references to third party websites are provided for your convenience only. Therefore please be aware that we do not accept responsibility for the content of any third party site(s) except content that is specifically attributed to us or our employees and where we are the authors of such content. Further, we accept no responsibility for any malicious codes (or their consequences) of external sites. Nor do we endorse any organisation or publication to which we link and make no representations about them.