Survey results reveals employees are left incredibly vulnerable to making poor decisions which could lead to a reduced income at-retirement.


WEALTH at work, a leading provider of financial education in the workplace, supported by guidance and advice, recently conducted a survey to investigate what’s changed in the workplace since the introduction of the pension changes. Its aim was to understand the attitudes and opinions of a range of UK companies in recognising the need to support their employees as they approach retirement.

Employees set to fail from the start

The survey results show that only 10% of employers believe their employees are saving enough for their retirement.

Jonathan Watts-Lay, Director, WEALTH at work comments; “I fear that employees are set to fail from the start when it comes to generating sufficient pension savings. With contribution rates for auto enrolment set so low, I believe that there is still a long way to go until we are at a stage where the majority of employees are producing sufficient pension savings for financial security in retirement.”

Survey results also reveal that, 39% of employers, will still default employees to an annuity tracked glide path if no active choice is made, this is despite a significant fall in annuity purchase since the pension freedoms took effect.

Watts-Lay adds; “In this new world of freedom and choice in pensions an annuity tracked glide path might not be the most suitable option, leaving many on an investment route which doesn’t match their retirement plans.”

He continues; “This is putting employees at a major disadvantage and could potentially result in a reduced income in retirement with severe consequences for some. It is crucial that employers provide financial education about the different glide path options available so that employees are armed with the facts to make suitable decisions.”

Employees abandoned at-retirement

Survey results reveal that almost half (48%) of employers believe that their employees are not aware of the various retirement income options available to them at-retirement.

Watts-Lay comments; “Without even a basic level of understanding of their options, it is hard to see how employees can secure a good retirement income outcome.”

In addition, the survey results reveal that more than half (55%) of employers either provide no support, or information only for employees at-retirement; with only 20% of employers providing a full retirement income service for employees at-retirement.

Watts-Lay comments; “It’s clear that many employees are simply abandoned at-retirement  and are left incredibly vulnerable to making poor decisions due to the lack of support available, or worse still being scammed by ‘an offer too good to ignore’. Financial support at this point must be made a priority given the enormity of the decisions that employees face at this stage of their life.”

He continues; “This doesn’t have to be the case as there are providers who can deliver a full service; from financial education and guidance, supported by regulated advice and then ensuring the appropriate service provision is available to implement all options at-retirement – whether that is an annuity, drawdown, a cash withdrawal, or indeed a combination of options over time.”

To download a copy of our survey results, please click here.

All statistics quoted are from the WEALTH at work: Pension Changes Survey – Our Survey Results 2017.

Further coverage was gained in Pensions Age, Pensions World, The HR Director,  Employee Benefits and Reward.

For more information, please contact us.


Links to websites external to those of Wealth at Work Limited (also referred to here as 'we', 'us', 'our' 'ours') will usually contain some content that is not written by us and over which we have no authority and which we do not endorse. Any hyperlinks or references to third party websites are provided for your convenience only. Therefore please be aware that we do not accept responsibility for the content of any third party site(s) except content that is specifically attributed to us or our employees and where we are the authors of such content. Further, we accept no responsibility for any malicious codes (or their consequences) of external sites. Nor do we endorse any organisation or publication to which we link and make no representations about them.