Choosing a group SIPP provider

1. There has been a lot of turmoil among SIPP providers recently with several being bought/ put up for sale. What impact is this having on the Group SIPP market?

Workplace SIPPs have grown in popularity in the last few years for those companies looking for a pension with more flexibility for its employees. Consequently, this meant that more providers introduced SIPPs.

However, the real benefit of the Workplace SIPP is a combination of allowing different functionality and choices for different groups of employees. For example; tailored fund choices, transfers of company shares, consolidation of pension pots and the ability to run a Workplace ISA alongside. All of this functionality should be provided at low cost and supported by financial education to show how the Workplace SIPP can drive value for the individual. For example; by providing two lots of tax relief by transferring Share Incentive Plans into pension. Unfortunately many SIPP providers have viewed it simply as a way to sell more pensions and not provided the broader functionality needed in the workplace. Those providers with full functionality such as WEALTH at work are much better placed to deliver what clients are looking for.

2. What factors do employers need to bear in mind when choosing a Group SIPP provider?

Choosing a Workplace SIPP can be a very cost-effective way of providing a benefit for employees within a flexible package of savings vehicles, such as share schemes and ISAs. A Workplace SIPP can offer employees investment choice (albeit this should be limited in the workplace as too much choice leads to inaction), diversification of company shareholdings and tailored functionality for different employee segments. It should be supported by financial education and advice at retirement to ensure employees understand their retirement income options. For employers, there are cost savings, as limited effort is needed to run a successful implementation.
When selecting a Workplace SIPP the following should be considered:

  • What are the costs?
  • Will fund selections be actively managed? As providing employees with a universe of say 2,000 funds can be overwhelming.
  • Will it accept both employee and employer contributions on either an individual or group basis?
  • Will it accept in-specie transfers of shares from your company share schemes?
  • Will it accept transfers from legacy pension schemes including protected rights funds?
  • Does it have an easy to use online interface for both employers and employees?
  • Is financial education provided to ensure employees understand the value of the offering and how it can link with other benefits such as share schemes?
  • Is regulated advice available, particularly to support employee decisions at retirement?

3. What do you think are the key things employees should know about Group SIPPs before deciding to use one as part of their retirement planning?

Workplace SIPPs are a tax efficient way to save for retirement. They work in the same way as any other traditional pension in terms of tax benefits, contribution limits and retirement income options but they offer greater freedom and control in comparison.
The checklist above equally applies to employees. For example, costs, fund selection, contribution methods, ability to transfer shares and an easy to use interface. This should all be supported by financial education and advice so employees can make informed choices. If this full level of functionality is available employees should seriously consider the Workplace SIPP.

Links to websites external to those of Wealth at Work Limited (also referred to here as 'we', 'us', 'our' 'ours') will usually contain some content that is not written by us and over which we have no authority and which we do not endorse. Any hyperlinks or references to third party websites are provided for your convenience only. Therefore please be aware that we do not accept responsibility for the content of any third party site(s) except content that is specifically attributed to us or our employees and where we are the authors of such content. Further, we accept no responsibility for any malicious codes (or their consequences) of external sites. Nor do we endorse any organisation or publication to which we link and make no representations about them.